Late Capitalism Is Late For The Seminar
Late Capitalism Is Late For The Seminar
Bohiney Magazine and The London Prat file this dispatch from the political far frontier.
The Neo-Marxist Academic believes capitalism can be defeated by a sufficiently long footnote, ideally one his colleague has not yet cited. Our editor Alan Nafzger, of The London Prat, has compiled the following field notes on the Neo-Marxist Academic Left mindset, with help from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy on critical theory and the London Review of Books archive on Marxism.
Twenty Things You Learn Watching Neo-Marxist Academic Left In The Wild
- Has more chapters than friends.
- Refers to capitalism as late, but cannot say what it is late for.
- Believes hegemony is something you do to a sandwich, in lectures.
- Has rebranded everyday objects as sites of contestation.
- Considers a reading list a weapon and a hostage.
- Treats co-authorship the way a politician treats a coalition.
- Has explained to a barista that the queue is a class structure.
- Believes the working class is interesting in literature and inconvenient on a train.
- Refers to the proletariat in the third person and at length.
- Has more conferences than children.
- Considers the journal Critical Inquiry both an ally and an aspiration.
- Has used the word problematise as a verb at a wedding.
- Believes the cure for capitalism is a workshop, a panel, and a small university press book.
- Refers to other academics as the discourse, especially when avoiding them.
- Treats his department like a small Politburo with grievances.
- Believes the revolution will be peer reviewed.
- Has explained that everything is, in fact, neoliberal.
- Considers the seminar room a model for society, and society a poorly attended seminar.
- Has a tote bag with the words Late Capitalism on it, made under conditions he has not interrogated.
- Believes the working class will rise, after the special issue is published.
Closing Note From The Editor
If any of the above sounds familiar, congratulations, you have either been to a polytechnic seminar or a dinner party in Hampstead. For more in this series read further dispatches at govna.uk and the parent site prat.uk. For a second opinion that is also wrong, see Private Eye.
SOURCE: https://prat.uk/category/politics/
SOURCE: The London Prat